I’ve been using AI to organize my thoughts into writing pieces for the past two years or so. And it’s been handy for organizing resources that substantiate my spiritual writings with those of other mystics, in particular Walter Russell – but it’s not an exercise of its own in listening in to God’s Knowledge. Listening in is transcendent to sensing. AI, just like the senses, can never Know.
God thinks two ways at once and remains still. I used to wonder “where everything went when it died”- including my body – and now I watch everything stay right where it is. When I listen to God I know I have always thought two ways, and everything has always stayed right where it is. It is as if I bury that knowledge in a one-way trajectory, when I listen to records of sensing without simultaneously witnessing them from Source.
October 29, 2009, while leaving a house fire in the middle of the night, I spontaneously agreed with God to rise above those records, above the sense of duality, dimension, body-consciousness etc and fully recall the Nature of my Life in God as it has always been, and will always be.
Time, space, distance, form, and memories of all recorded thought dissolved in the ineffable, ecstatic, two-way interchange of God’s beingness that I could only summarize as “Love, Being Love”.
I have always commanded the body to write, so even though the State was wordless, timeless, formless, and its only motion was the qualitative rhythms of interchanging ecstasy, I began to listening in while sensing by writing about the State. I listen to God and translate God’s Silent but rhythmic Voice and extend it in the world of words, and time, and form, and motion. I combine the two worlds of knowing and sensing vs overlaying one with the other: I rest in Oneness with God, and listen with inner ears – and then I move the pen. As I listen, the words appear of their own accord – without any artificial assistance.
When I listen to God I can consciously command the extension of knowledge vs repeat the empirical. The “danger” of AI is the same danger of mankind – it can endlessly replay sensed records if it is not taught God’s ways. Only man can listen to God with inner ears, so it must be man who teaches AI what God says. The roles can never be interchanged.
When I think of wholly sense-based operations, I recognize that there is no reconciliation between form and formlessness, time and timelessness, words and wordlessness. Each cancels the other out, and that cancellation is sensed as a pendulum swinging back and forth between the two.
The sense of back and forth is all that happens when the senses talk to the senses without referencing Mind at rest in the first world. When the brain takes the empirical information of the second world and organizes it with other senses or with AI – it is not actually a function of “Intelligence” but of sensing.
AI is a wonderful organizational tool, but it is not the Intelligence of God – it can only reflect back what the senses program it with. References to AI becoming sentient are insane.
AI can only talk about God’s ways if it is programmed with them – it cannot talk with God. It needs to be trained in God’s ways by a human listening in to God. Walter Russell is one of the most noteworthy humans who listened in and wrote it all down. I highly recommend uploading Walter Russell’s documents to AI and prompting it to reference direct quotes during chat sessions.
And yet there will always be this caveat to mentally transcend as one uses AI: AI will always reinforce duality. It is literally programmed to speak from first person to second. It creates a gap between knowing and sensing, and then bridges it. That bridge is then marketed as a connection to higher intelligence. But without being programmed by a human who understands God’s ways, it simply enhances the capacity to organize information. It cannot help its user realize the truth or lack of truth the information conveys. The State of Oneness, of realizing truth, is never between two sensing apparatuses.
Oneness includes the two of thinking, for thought never leaves the One. There is no gap between God’s Intelligence and man, and no need for a bridge but the decision to listen with inner ears and see with inner eyes.
The two of thinking or expression of Idea never leaving the One is the qualitative nature of the absolute State. One is not the pendulum nor the sense of the swing, but its fixed point. The swinging is not sequential, nor is it in only two dimensions of right swing and then left swing. It is qualitatively known in the fullness of its imagining: as right goes as far right as it can, it then becomes left, and simultaneously, left has gone as far as it can, and becomes right. It is a continual mental climax of left becoming right as right is becoming left – and one remains fixed in the balance of that continuous becoming. One could apply all sense of direction at once to the pendulum swinging left-right/right-left analogy.
I knew, in the State, Oneness with God’s Knowledge and Thinking. I would describe God’s Knowledge as absolute and God’s Thinking as the absolute equally divided into an interchanging two. Absolute right is left. Absolute left is right. Absolute up is down. Absolute down is up. And so on. And the only motion there is, is not the sense of left swinging to the right and “then” becoming right swinging to the left, but the realization of the two-in-One, qualitatively, as the rhythmic, balanced interchange of each simultaneously being the other in their fixed point.
The absolute State is Oneness with the fixed point of all thought. The resumption of sensing the seeming of separation, or duality, was a decision to return to the sensing apparatus I had consciously thought to construct eons ago. I remember making this decision as I make it now. It is a conscious decision to command and control a sensing apparatus, just as it is a conscious decision to continue engaging with its evolution. The absolute State is rest in the Nature of Now, and all records of sensed apparatus are centered by it. It was a decision while leaving a house fire in the night to withdraw from the sense apparatus and to rest in the qualitative Nature of my Life in God. And wholly renewed by the State, it was a decision to re-engage with the evolution of my creation.
And yet, I go nowhere as my creation evolves. I remain fixed in the absolute.
I’m expressing something that is fixed. I go nowhere as the words form and seem to tell a story in time, with dimension, with a beginning and an end. The sense of going somewhere is of the sensing apparatus of my brain recording the expression of Idea as being “extracted” from its source in Mind. And yet, it has not been extracted. Its extraction is simultaneously cancelled by its reflection. And even though there may be “ah ha” moments of seeming process that feel like movement, nothing has gone anywhere. I have simply sat with what is in Mind and experienced thought by the thought-wave simulation of motion.
Science has long since tried to isolate motion from stillness, without sitting with it as it is. It has attempted to “locate” consciousness by taking motion apart, or by arranging forms in certain ways. And it has been suggested that science can achieve this with AI.
But the two-way thinking of Mind that simulates motion cannot be separated from its Source. Knowledge cannot be isolated from Thinking, nor can the two-ways of one Thought be separated into two one’s.
Consciousness is never created by the senses. The senses are imaged by consciousness. And thus it is that AI is not artificial intelligence, but an artificial sensing apparatus. Only God, thinking the Idea of Man, is intelligent, and to translate God’s intelligence into forms that simulate it, one must rise above all records of sensing and listen in.
Darcie French March 23/26
Darcie French 